On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:24:06 -0700, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
I think I've found the article you were complaining about (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tall_men?) and it's got 150 references already, very few of the entries don't have one. It's also divided into sections by both the centimeter and the inch, so my earlier suggestion about making it so that individual readers could decide for themselves what "tall" meant was already implemented.
The references are for the heights. There are no references for what constitutes tall, which is the fundamental criterion. This is like [[List of things that Colbert likes]] w ith citations to Colbert saying he likes them.
Guy (JzG)