It took a while, Robert, but we did ban this guy for one year (I would have banned him indefinitely). I would have banned him (if our policy permited) for his anti-semitisim and systematic point of view editing (just as I would ban you should the opportunity arise for systematic point of view editing, if our policy permitted).
I don't know what we can do about someone who sees anti-Semitism everywhere and thinks he is being persecuted. The problem is that you are a very aggressive editor, constantly pushing your "scientism" point of view, so folks are in fights with you. Perhaps some take cheap shots at you once they learn you are sensitive. Then there are a few actual anti-Semites (I would exclude those who are disturbed by the excesses of Zionism).
As to talking with folks, it slows you down, but generally is at least as productive as writing articles. Your opponents would not be editing the article you are unless they have a common interest in the topic. I think, at least sometimes, great differences in perspective can be bridged or at least understood. Not that I was ever able to do that with you. But, if you were wiling to listen and think about others perspectives I think you might be able to work with some editors with whom you think you can't work with.
Fred
From: Robert rkscience100@yahoo.com Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 14:43:29 -0700 (PDT) To: wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia's problems
It got even worse: In recent weeks Steve Rubenstein warned you all about another Jew-hater who was constantly vandalizing Wikipedia and clearly pushing Nazi websites. Yet in response, you refused to ban this person. Outrageously many of you said that you wanted this Nazi's views, and that you wanted to find a way to keep him on as a contributor.