On 10/11/05, Worldtraveller wikipedia@world-traveller.org wrote:
However, I think lowering FA standards would be very bad. We should be identifying the very best we have to offer, while also identifying the less spectacular good stuff. So, I have just started Wikipedia:Good articles, which is my idea for how our good but not the best content can be recognised. All comments welcome of course.
Actually, I agree with you there. There really needs to be both, although perhaps eventually FAC could be step 2 of the process. I would have started [[Wikipedia:Candidates for 1.0]] myself, except that I'm not allowed. Good luck with [[Wikipedia:Good articles]]. I'm not allowed to edit that page either.
WT
Anthony