[I fixed your post for you.]
On 04/06/07, Brock Weller brock.weller@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 6/3/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, if the infringement of copyright is the act of
"purchase",
not "sale", the US legal system is seriously fucked up.
Infringement is the act of "copying", "distribution", or "public performance/display".
All of which look to me like that which is done by the infringer, not by the person who acquires the infringed material.
Most likely, yes, and no one said otherwise.
*Bzzzzt*. You said "Each time someone downloads the page there is a new infringement". That means that something done by the person who acquires the material causes the infringement.
Each time we serve up copyrighted material is a new infringement. It's not hard to understand. Anthony happens to be correct here.
Ah, so an action by the person receiving the material *does* cause an infringement! Anthony said it didn't.