One can use editorial judgment regarding how to present sourced information coherently and logically without original research.
On 4/2/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/2/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
This appears to be the sort of obsession with replacing editorial judgement with rules that makes Wikipedia into a red tape obstacle course.
Unfortunately, good sense and quality cannot in fact be Taylorised.
100% agreed with David here.
I'd add that any sufficiently complex system of rules can be rules-lawyered by the intelligent and nitpicky to allow results not anticipated by the rules' crafters.
-Matt
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l