On 05/09/07, Mark Ryan ultrablue@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia's logo is quite distinctive, changing that would probably be a step backwards. But Monobook could do with a change.
Our logo is an INCREDIBLY powerful brand. I hope we can start selling 3-D puzzle globe keyrings soon ...
I like Monobook a lot, actually. I used Classic before, but I think Monobook is fundamentally well-designed. Flashy is not a virtue.
As it stands at the moment, I think Monobook is too complex, because over the years we've been using it, little links have been added here and there, making it a bit of a patchwork quilt.
There is that. But that's a tweaking issue rather than a new-skin issue.
- d.