On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:24:12 -0600, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Unlikely. The test, as I understand it, is significance, and whether the use impacts on the rights owner's ability to profit from the work. The rights owner in this case does publish derivative works based on the Cool Wall.
Cite? I thought you said they considered it so trivial they didn't even include a listing on their homepage, part of your "original research" claim on this subject. Now it's a major revenue stream instead?
"What not to drive", Hammond, Weidenfeld & Nicolson 2005, ISBN 0297848003
Guy (JzG)