On 30/05/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
Here's a fifth case: links to attack sites in the talk page discussing the attack sites policy.
I don't think there is such a policy, though, so its moot. There was a strawman policy proposed at one time, which seemed specifically designed to draw attention to WR, but that's a different situation.
Don't be dense - this is precisely what happened in the talk page of what was WP:BADSITES.
- d.