Ryan Delaney wrote:
Delirium wrote:
These seem to have been cleaned up pretty quickly, which is nice to see. Wikipedia's actually better now for Mr. Kell's contributions---even though the original ones were not neutral, they did contain some good information that we previously didn't have, and now do.
The problem is, I cleaned them up by cutting out a lot of potentially useful information because it was original research and I didn't know how to go about citing it, since I'm not familiar with the issue. Check the edit histories.
Shouldn't you be moving such sections to the Talk page?