Dante Alighieri wrote:
With all due respect mav, this is bs. No one voted for the logo that is currently on the 'pedia. I'd like to ask Jimbo to step in at this point and make some sort of decree from on high... this logo thing is getting out of hand.
I'm not sure what I'd decree. My wife asked me the other day "why does the logo keep changing?" I had to admit that I didn't actually know. I just said, "Oh, you know... wikipedia... we like to change things... and there's some kind of vote going on, or revisions or something."
It'd be irresponsible for me to make a decree when I've given up on following the details lately. :-)
But I can make a meta-decree: we need to draw this to some kind of conclusion within the next week or two. And the conclusion, the selected logo, should have been chosen by the process that we've been following, including voting and what-not. And unless someone has a really good case that Erik has done something egregiously contrary to the spirit of voting on the logo, I'll leave it to him to certify the final result. And I think we should have another logo competition of some sort, 2 years hence.
--Jimbo