http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JzG&diff=prev&ol...
The article in question originally stated that the subject, a minor far-right Tory, was cleared on appeal of charges; actually it turns out he was convicted. Ever since that fact went into the article there has been a war waged, with legal letters sent to Ed Chilvers, now threatened to me, Brad involved, and so on. Having failed to have the article pulled by Brad they submitted a complaint through OTRS which resulted in stubbing; we do not know (because nobody will tell us) whether this was because of supposed imbalance, in which case we can start rebuilding to NPOV standards immediately, or whether it was their novel interpretation of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, which conflicts with the text of the act as posted.
These people are apparently determined to have a hagiography or nothing, and they also appear to want to intimidate away anybody who has any interest at all in keeping the article factual.
Guy (JzG)