Hello Blankfaze,
WE PRESENT INFORMATION (an image of autofellatio is, no matter what any idiot argues, information) WE DO NOT CENSOR INFORMATION
while I happen to agree with your opinion, I would note that reasonable people can disagree about this. Certainly some images will offend a great many people, while others will only offend few.
Now, I would argue that it is wrong and POV for us to remove them -- and if we did that using this standard, we would have to remove many political images on the same grounds. But, I don't think it's wrong for us to provide people with meaningful labels and allow them not to see certain images. This could be done right now using stylesheets by putting the whole image in a <div id="male-sexual-act"> tag.
Users could then hide such images by associating the ID with the attribute "display:none;" in their stylesheet. No POV on our part - just someone deciding on their own what they don't want to see. We could have <div id="violence-against-animals">, <div id="crucifixion"> etc., as well. In spite of Christianity being a widespread delusion, some people from different cultures might be offended by explicit religious imagery featuring a half-naked man nailed to a cross and covered in blood. Again, we could give them the choice to hide such imagery.
It's a bit like image copyright tagging. If we start doing this now, we can work on improving the tools to filter in the future.
Regards,
Erik