On 4/8/06, Jay Whetherspoon polynomialjay@gmail.com wrote:
There's no legal reason to remove a completely legal image.
What do you mean by "legal reason"? If you mean, legally, we are not required to remove a legal image, then that's a tautology. If you mean, there is no valid reason to remove a legal reason, then that's simply incorrect. We remove images that are redundant, irrelevant, possibly copyright violations, offensive, poor quality, ugly, corrupt...
And morality is entirely subjective. Arguing that a certain image is "immoral" is *not* a valid argument in the context of Wikipedia, because we have to adhere to WP:NPOV. You, personally, see this drawing as morally wrong. I do not.
But visitors to the site might, and if they feel strongly enough, they might even do something about it.
Steve