We censor pictures of clitoris on the english wikipedia. We censor clitoris pictures, while billion of humans on Earth have a clitoris, and that is something perfectly normal to have.
We censor clitoris for the motive that people could be shocked.
However, we do not censor pictures of torture and humiliation. Forgive me, but I am troubled.
No, I do not think everything should be shown, especially soon after they happen. Just as some criminal trials of WWII horors were recorded, but the records preserved for several years before being shown publicly. This in memory of the deads. Even though we know what happened.
So, explain to me why we show shocking images of human humiliation, while we cant display clitoris, because chaste eyes would be shocked ?
Fred Bauder a écrit:
They belong. If they allowed picture taking at the Colorado State Penitentiary or in a prison in France they would belong too. Their importance is that most torture in prisons happens without pictures being taken. These pictures have to stand in place of the hundreds or even thousands of similar situations that don't get recorded. Or is that too creative?
Fred