Actually I also think his text, indeed most of his philosophical writings could probably be deleted without reducing the amount of information in the encyclopedia. However reverts have occured when his material is deleted.
Be careful, he has his supporters.
Well I'm not doing anything without the agreement of the majority of other wikipedians. I'm arguing that putting *any* of his text is a type of bias, and unfare for other contributers who want their work published in this way (In my example even if others will probably dismiss my "writings" as psuedo-science or just utter nonsense).
I think we should start a vote,
* either Larry's text is removed (or transfered to ideapedia/allpedia previously suggested). I am willing to compormise even more to say it wouldn't be linked to and wouldn't possibly be found by a casual wikipedia user. (i.e. on searches, inlined in other articles like "knowledge" etc..)
* or: Larry's text is adopted and inlined/linked as "de facto" philosophical literature. (As it is today, or even more) and "peer-reviewed" by wiki readers.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com