Note, in other words, that the "defence" of the PR editing here is
entirely deflection
To an extent.
It also represents frustration along the lines of: "whenever one of us does a bad thing we get lambasted in the news, but when they do a bad thing it gets no traction or notice"
I don't *necessarily *blame them for taking advantage of the scrutiny of PR and trying to make it about the problems Wikipedia has as well.
Tom