Travis Mason-Bushman wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Jake Nelson wrote:
Deleting one valid article is a significantly bad thing; not deleting ten bad articles is so minor a bad thing as to be almost beneath notice.
I would vehemently disagree, especially when among those ten articles are hoaxes, thinly veiled attack pages, vanispamcruftvertisements and other such content that has the effect of actively making Wikipedia a *worse* and *less authoritative* source of information.
Since absolutely nobody is arguing to keep the kind of article you describe you are saved from you self-imposed obligation of vehemently disagreeing.
Ec