Daniel Mayer (maveric149@yahoo.com) [050109 03:28]:
--- David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Basically, not making it en-only was so OBVIOUSLY the right thing (because, ahh, it isn't en-only - en's front page is en.wikipedia.org) that people just went 'w00t!' and dived right in.
I'm well aware of that and completely agree. I just don't like the fact that we went live with a lame solution before developing something good. I know that wikiwiki has always been cart-before-horse, but this is *very* visible real estate.
There is that. But it's improved noticeably over the last 24 hours and I expect shall continue to do so in rapid order.
Still need someone to put up the Japanese version of "The Free Encyclopedia" ...
- d.