On 9/18/06, Death Phoenix originaldeathphoenix@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, then I'll leave my votes as is. :-) Based on your comments above, it would seem that Cynical nailed this down perfectly: he singled out three people who wouldn't be good, and approved of everyone else.
Thats really more like an approval vote should be used... it's an admission that the world is a complex place and that we can't say that X is better than Y, but that we can say the Z just won't work.
I suspect that the approval vote process would be better if there were multiple open seats,... at least mathmatically a multi seat election is more fair... but I also think the voting public would be less likely to try to game it.
Oh well.. I don't look forward to another round of elections should we decide to pull from the community for the expanded board seats.