Greetings, Got a bit of a dispute going on over on [[New anti-Semitism]] that involves [[User:SlimVirgin]] and [[User:Jayjg]] surrounding an image and neutral point of view. The article is prominently displaying an image with a caption that does not establish the relevance of the image to the article. I have tried to include in the caption that the image's source believes it to be an example of Anti-Semitism but my edit have been reverted. Due to text in the image being small and difficult to read, at first glance the image does appear anti-Semitic but upon further analysis it is arguably sooner an example of anti-Zionism. My edits to establish what the image's source has said about the image (and thereby establish it's relevance to the article) were removed with the reasoning that we should, "let the reader decide". I've explained that in accord with NPOV, text saying that "Source X says Y about Z" needs to be added to the caption but Jayjg has Wikilawyerly asked me to show specific NPOV text that applies to images. I pointed out that WP:NOR states as much and yet I'm still rebuffed. Since, another editor has joined the discussion and agreed that the image should have a caption establishing it's relevance to the article but he too has been rebuffed. Some additional eyes on this would be very helpful. See this talk: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:NewASAnti-Semiticposter.jpg and this talk: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_anti-Semitism#Question_about_top_poste...
Thanks,
-Scott [[User:Netscott]]