On 3/12/07, William Pietri william@scissor.com wrote:
We do not need those people editing on Wikipedia.
No one has ever suggested we would allow the type of behaviour that Almeda is attempting. There is a world of difference between someone attempting to expand or improve a subject field, for remuneration, and someone repeatedly working on the perceived bias of one particular article.
There are all sorts of ways we could handle this. Like "You can pay someone to edit articles on your behalf. But you have to tell us first, and if we tell you to stop, you have to stop." What's wrong with that?
Steve