On 1/17/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/17/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/17/06, Jimmy Wales jwales@wikia.com wrote:
Hermione1980 wrote:
The first problems I see are 1. transparency
I see no problem with transparency. Transparency doesn't mean that we are in any way required to carry every little snippet of non-notable discussion on things forever.
It pretty much does.
Not to be facetious, but that does depend exactly *how much* transparency. I think Jimbo's point is that there is no meaningful loss in transparency.
If there's ever any reason anyone needs to look at it, then they can look at it.
Not without some difficulty.
Again, that is the balance to be struck.
-- Sam
I think that deleting VFD/AFD debates does eliminate a certain degree of transparency. At the very least, we should keep a record on the comments and result on the subpage, if not the actual comments themselves. I don't think it is '''Delete''' that we are worrying about, but rather the actual text that follows.
-- Ben Emmel Wikipedia - User:Bratsche bratsche1@gmail.com "A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees." -- William Blake