On 7/7/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
A reasonable definition of "encyclopedic" is "covering all knowledge." Therefore there exists reasonable criteria by which the article would be encyclopedic. Your claim that "by any reasonable criteria" the article is not encyclopedic is not accurate.
If you are using "knowledge" as a mere synonym for "information", sure, but does a near miss between two planes qualify as "knowledge", or is it simply just a bit of trivia, an unimportant data point?