On 8/7/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
Amazing that an arbitrator would not be familiar with this:
[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] contemplates inclusion of all significant points of view regarding a subject.
Let's go further: All articles must contain all significant viewpoints about their topics, represented without bias, and given space in proportion to their acceptance in the relevant communities.
Incidentally, [[WP:NPOV]] has (now that I think about it), an awful and useless "nutshell" summary: "All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This includes maps, reader-facing templates, categories, and portals."
It doesn't even mention the critical bit, that all relevant views are supposed to be there. According to that summary, [[GWB]] could simply contain GWB bashing with no rebuttal, as "fairly" representing the views of Democrats...
Steve