-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Exactly. Child porn images shouldn't be included for moral and legal reasons but ordinary sexual images (where they are relevant to the article of course) are perfectly fine. WP:NOT censored for minors.
Cynical
Philip Welch wrote:
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:40 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
I'm not convinced there's much reason to include *any* images of *any* sex acts, involving children or otherwise. Does Britannica?
We're not just trying to replace Britannica; we're trying to replace specialized encyclopedias as well. I'm sure that an encyclopedia of sexual behavior would include sketches of varying sexual positions much like our own.