geni schrieb:
On 27/02/2008, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
- They are fearing a slippery slope. There are certainly more articles where a minority rejects certain images. But I can't see how a new message box with that kind of functionality, would enlarge that problem rather than reduce it. If members of the Bahá'í Faith, creationists, Africans or Serbians object to certain images now, they can already cause trouble by removing them. Why should it be any worse, when there is a possibility to make [[Wikipedia:Options to not see an image]] more flexible?
We can revert removals and blunt force edit waring will get them nowhere. Giveing them another tool to forward their campaign though would make things harder.
But are they still "forwarding their campaign", when they change their target from "remove those images" to "give us a possibility to hide them easily"? Besides, why would it be harder to revert the addition of a "collapse image message box" than reverting image removals?