Yeah, you completely avoided the statement. I wasn't saying removing them without looking made us look silly, I said that having them in looked silly. Well set up strawman though. Care to answer the actual statement now?
On 6/20/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Brock Weller wrote:
The first one made us look silly and the second one made us
encyclopedic? My
earlier post sums this up fairly well.
Changing articles without reading them looks encyclopediac, while changing articles after reading them is silly?
No offense, but if that's true, we're better off with silly.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l