On 10/4/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/4/05, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. The opposed groups are not "inclusionists" versus deletionists, but *contributors* versus deletionists. (This is still the case even though the deletionists contribute elsewhere.) Then the deletionists wonder why the contributors get so damn stroppy.
- d.
Does this mean that the deletionist get to relalable them selves as well? If so can we call it the contributors vs the Encyclopedists ? Or we could go the other way and let both sides relable to the opposeing sides.
I know, I know: how about the Capulets and Montagues? Crips and the Bloods? Yeah! Or the Sharks and the Jets. Then there could be a tender story of children of the warring Associations thrown together by fate and passion, tossed on the winds of information, tenderly editing each others articles, realizing the narrow creed they followed was nothing when it came to verifying AND including their love for another, each one spouting verse on the others talk page in the middle of the night, being bold, breaking the 3RR together, only to be cut down and burned out in a brutal flamewar ending only in tragedy as one takes the poison of AfD and the other falls on his own WP:POINT in a message to all, and eyes are opened by this tragedy, leading to a historic agreement as Jimbo Wales eulogizes over their young but lifeless accounts, complete with tender homilies about community and vision and how he C0ntr0lz Teh Un1v3rs3.
Or not.
smws (Wikipedia:Kiaparowits)
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l