Hi,
I am writing here pretty much as a last resort. I have been blocked by an admin for 1 month, but despite repeated requests for an explanation as to which policy or guideline justifies my block, four admins so far have declined to answer this. I consider this to be a simple question to ask, and would expect no less than the ability for an admin to be able to justify the block by citing applicable policy.
Please can someone look into this?
I also am concerned that four admins have chosen to decline the unblock request without feeling it necessary to provide the explanation requested.
In a court of law it's mandatory that the accused is given their reasons, and the applicable statute or case law referred to. Is there no similar requirement for justice within Wikipedia?
I also think there should be a facility for admins who operate outside of the law (if it can be called that) to be able to face consequences for their actions by some higher governing body - does such a body exist?
Many thanks, R E Broadley (User:Rebroad)