On 8/30/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 8/30/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
I have no idea where he did it
Then buzz off, troll.
You intentionally misquoted me, but I'm the troll?
I didn't misquote you.
Yes, you did. You asked the question "where" did this happen, as though that was a question which had a reasonable answer (in the study, with a candlestick?). I pointed out that your question of "where" was meaningless, and then proceeded to describe what happened. You responded by quoting half of this response and then calling me a troll.
"The first time Jimbo decided to restrict editing and call it becoming more open"
You used the word "and" in your claim. Do trolls come from an alternate universe where and has been redefined as OR?
Absolutely not. Again I ask you which part of this claim you're denying. Are you saying it was a different person who closed new page creation and claimed that Wikipedia is getting more open?
Your logic would have me expecting you to agree with this statement: "Anthony is a homicidal pedophile AND he posts to this list."
And your logic would have me responding to that with "where was I a homicidal pedophile and post to the list".
Anyway, I shouldn't be feeding the troll. To get back on topic, *this FAQ* is dishonest, regardless of what happened in the past. Look at the very beginning of it: " * What is changing?
We want to open up editing without damaging the reader's experience."
Is that what's changing? Wouldn't it be better to answer the question from the beginning?
As was pointed out by someone else, *who* wants to open up editing? And who decided this was the best way to do this?
Anthony