LittleDan wrote:
Well, then that's just because of its POV. We link to POV sites. LDan
There may be some instances, where it is justified to link to a propaganda source. For example, if you have an article about Serbian history, I would not protest against having a link to freesrpska, provided that a comment explains the nature of that site. But we don't need to have this link on every page about a detail of Serbian history. Take for example the article "Skull Tower"; it is a quite short article, but it is followed by three (!) links to the freesrpska page, among them a subpage pretending to explain the "Islamic conflict on the Balkan" (see http://www.freesrpska.org/en/prevare/islam.html for that blatant propaganda). Our readers will click on these links and read all this garbage.
Nikola (the author of the articles) offered to provide a comment next to all these links, reading "be warned that some of other articles on this site might be propagandistic and biased" - but I consider it dangerous to have these links at all.
Mirko