On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, stevertigostvrtg@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.comwrote:
2009/6/27 stevertigo stvrtg@gmail.com:
Thomas, the distinctions you present -- that dispute resolution has
public
and private dimensions, and that these different dimensions of dispute resolution require different technological formats -- is unknown to me.
Is
there policy in which the necessity for these distinctions is outlined?
I never said it was necessary, I just said that's the way it is. Unless you can describe a problem with a current system, I see no reason to change it.
You could start a thread called "if it ain't broke don't fix it" and there we can debate whether the axiom applies to anything other than appliances. :-)
I would actually suggest two lists, if we could do this -
One, an announce-only list which summarized ongoing dispute resolution (arbcom cases, RFCs, community discussions of note elsewhere) for those who find following all the threads on-wiki daunting with real life time constraints.
Two, discussion.
Perhaps one list, but a regular posting of the announcements, but I think some people would be more interested in just announcements. I would participate in both, but I think that giving some people the option to just get the announcements is more respectful of their bandwidth...