Quit being rude and have a little faith.
I already explained it is a random sample higher up the thread.
-Robert
On 10/10/07, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
My comment on the reliability isn't suggesting that sampling is completely unreliable. But sampling with no comment on the selection method? That sounds like bullshit to me, and I'm not going to trust what is quite possibly an unreliable sample of whole. If you want to me to trust your stats, you need to provide more info than that.
On 10/10/07, Robert Rohde rarohde@gmail.com wrote:
If you like thinking about "events", cascading protection led to an ~80% drop in the protection rate for images. (Though image protection is
only
a few percent of all protections).
-Robert
On 10/10/07, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/10/2007, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Here's a couple more events to consider: when was the captcha for unregistered edits which add an external link added? how about the captcha for new article creation?
It'd be interesting to make up a timeline of all the events we can think of which might possibly affect these numbers, and then attach them to the chart.
Semiprotection (could go either way); resolution of 550 (probably uptick in blocks *and* editing activity).
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l