On 5/24/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Skyring wrote:
In deference to the uptothemoment nature of Wikipedia, I'll support
spoiler
warnings for recent works of fiction and movies. Shakespeare or Tom
Clancy,
no - they belong to the ages.
I assume then you completely disagree with the claim that spoilers are original research? After all, we can't allow original research just for articles about newer subjects, we must completely eliminate it.
At this point, I hear the unmistakable groaning and sighing sound of a long bow being drawn. Must Wikipedia always be a community of fundamentalists battling over which end of the egg to slice?