On 5/6/06, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/6/06, maru dubshinki marudubshinki@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all. We are currently in a position to judge well old stuff- I can't remember the last time someone complained about "Ancient Greek-cruft" or "Renaissance-cruft", so while we certainly are still missing notable stuff from those areas, we don't seem to have a problem keeping out the non-notable crap stuff from that area.
I can't recall the names of the articles, but there was a series of 16th-century samurai bios up for deletion recently on the grounds that they were "non-notable retainers" ;-)
Kirill Lokshin
Whoa. Just goes to show that making generalizations in a place as big as Wikipedia is a perilous business.
~maru