-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I agree, but my suggestion was aimed at creating an objective criterion which could not be 'gamed' (whereas there could be endless arguments about what constitutes 'erotica')
Cynical
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell webmaster@davidarussell.co.uk wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
- elements of erotica,
- and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify those inclusions.
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l