Hello!
Today I wanted to read [[Opus Dei]] - and frankly, I didn't exactly like what I saw. The article reads like it was written by the Opus Dei. Checking the history, I found that mainly two IPs have been editing the article a *few* times, spamming it with Opus Dei POV, and completely drowning the remaining bits of criticism. .
Compare http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opus_Dei&oldid=10888580 to the current version.
Now, I put a Totally Disputed tag into it, but I don't really feel like doing a rollback, because I have to would roll back more than 600 (!) edits. (For the same reason I can't give you a diff - max shown are 500.)
Given that people still hit us with that one "checking" of WP where we didn't call the disputed birth date of somebody I never heard of "disputed" [1], well, if those people find that article, we will never hear the end of it - besides the minor problem of the article not exactly being up to WP standards, like NPOV. Something should be done, but as I said, I don't really feel I should do a rollback on my own.
Alex
[1] http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20050419MicrosoftEncarta...