So your opinion is now law?
Wonderful. We don't need all of those nasty little polls or votes at VfD or VfU or everywhere else. All we have to do is have you make the decision for us.
I thought Jimbo was the benevolent dictator. You seem just to want to be dictator, period.
RickK
Nicholas Knight nknight@runawaynet.com wrote: Bryan Derksen wrote:
At 05:26 PM 2/13/2005 -0800, Nicholas Knight wrote:
I see nothing wrong with an encyclopedia having a blanket policy that sexually explicit photographs not be displayed in articles. You can argue relativism, subjectiveness, and "censorship" all you want, we both know it's crap.
You _think_ it's crap. Others obviously think otherwise, or there'd be no ongoing debate.
Guess what? They're wrong. I'm right.
There, I said it.
It's CRAP. Everyone here KNOWS it. Stop pretending this is a grey area, it's not. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'