Charles Matthews wrote:
Pete/Pcb21 wrote
.In practice this would mean giving Anthony admin rights ...
You joke, sir.
Any cons?
IMHO the correct approach is to ignore him, here as elsewhere.
Anthony has argued his position calmly, coherently, and persuasively - and taken care to respect and fairly represent the other point of view in the process.
I agree with a large proportion of what he has said - and I find myself reassessing my own views on where the line should be for inclusion.
I'm not sure whether you are suggesting we should ignore Anthony because you have a personal dislike of him, or because you dislike his arguments - but either way it's a poor response that's not likely to help the discussion, or Wikipedia, in any way.
--sannse