On 6/18/08, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
And in this case, the remedy was attached to a case that didn't seem, on its face, to have anything whatsoever to do with the issue the remedy was addressing; it was a case about the formatting of reference quotes, about as "wiki-wonky" a topic as you can imagine, and got very little attention even from those who regularly follow what the ArbCom is up to, compared to some more drama-intensive ArbCom cases going on at the same time.
Yes any page titled "requests for arbitration/footnoted quotes" is almost guaranteed from day one to be dismissed as shit nobody cares about by anyone who might be aware of it. Looking at the result I can't decide whether this is Sophoclean irony or Epeian brilliance.
—C.W.