G'day geni,
On 7/6/06, Mark Gallagher m.g.gallagher@student.canberra.edu.au wrote:
DRV is a safeguard to ensure that AfD gets the right *result*. That's all it's for --- *not*, I repeat *not*, simply to ensure AfD gets the right *process*. Process being followed is a good indication that the AfD result was good; but it shouldn't blind us to potential errors.
An argument that fails when you consider you only need an absolute majority to keep something deleted on DRV. If it is to be more than a process review area then that is illogical.
I'll admit, it relies on people not abusing it. But then, so does a lot of Wikipedia.