cprompt a écrit:
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 10:41, Anthere wrote:
Labelling the normal penis a "uncircumsized penis" is POV.
I repeat, labelling the normal penis a "uncircumsized" penis is POV
It is like putting on an article about [[teenager]], with two pictures of two teenager girls, one white and one black :
as legend, "a white girl" and "a non white girl".
I recall reading that in the United States, most men are circumcised, and in the rest of the world, most men aren't. Since both circumcised and uncircumcised are fairly common, it makes sense to have them side-by-side for comparison. Since men with pierced penises (ouch) are rather uncommon (so I would think), if we were to have a picture of one, I'd agree it shouldn't receive the same attention as the pictures on the top of the article.
in the United States, most men are circumcised in the rest of the world, most men aren't
conclusion : both situations are common.
I do not know why, but I feel like I could go on a rant here. I really do.