2008/11/26 Michael Everson everson@evertype.com:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 15:08, David Gerard wrote:
Sounds horribly like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonia .
Horrible, maybe, but how do we get a solution?
I'm pretty much suggesting some sort of numbers on what readers expect as a convincing pointer on which way to go. We're all supposed to be doing this to build a resource to be used, after all.
How to gather these is more difficult. If we could trace navigation through pages (even anonymised), that'd help a lot. (Though it sounds like a minefield of privacy pitfalls.) Failing that, gathering numbers as widely as possible outside Wikipedia, in a manner that all sides would accept as usably objective, would be good. Not that I can think of one off the top of my head.
- d.