WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
...snipped...
In an attempt to be useful, I would like to identify the best within your complaint, WJhonson, so that we can acknowledge it and move past it.
The argument seems to go like this:
Since one basis for the objecting to Mohammad images in Wikipedia is based on Islamic traditions which also, in at least some cases, forbid other imagery, we might legitimately ask ourselves whether agreeing to do something about this case will lead to further demands to do something about other cases.
There are a number of reasonable responses to this reasonable inquiry, some of which most of us may find persuasive. But of course this core point is valid, i.e. will helping to find a compromise in this case actually help resolve anything?
Simply repeating over and over as if nothing can be done at all without falling into this trap does not appear to be usefully moving this discussion forward.
--Jimbo