On 8/25/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
Any suggestions? Is "first source" better? I can't imagine interpreting "First source for information" chronologically...
The use of the word everything is also a potential source of problems. Wikipedia is not the "inital source one consults" about the rumors that your classmate is HIV+.
Sure it is, you'll also find out that he is gay but has a huge penis...
Illustrated too..
Hit me.
My 'we' was generally intended to include our brilliant participants and not so much me. :)
But, sure, anyone can generate an infinite number of these... here are some random ones, from more slogany to more explantory:
Wikipedia- The freedom of knowledge Wikipedia- Participatory Enlightenment Wikipedia- The Encyclopedia by the world, for the world. Wikipedia- The [[polymath|Renaissance man's]] compendium. Wikipedia- edit this encyclopedia Wikipedia- [[WP:NPOV|Neutral]] contributors are always [[WP:welcome|welcome]]. Wikipedia- Collecting the knoweldge of the whole world requires the participation of the whole world. Wikipedia- Your way right away.
well, perhaps not the last.