On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Stephen Bain wrote:
If you look at it, it seems meant for cases where the English name is a loanword or was written in a strange way on purpose, not for mistakes.
So, apart from you, who says it's a mistake?
Didn't we just cover this already?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I'm not clear on it either. If there really is a big mistake, surely some source has published -something- regarding that mistake in a slightly more reliable venue than WikiEN-l. Controversial or disputed changes do need a source beyond "I said so", even if you have good reason to say so. If sources got it wrong, try to get someone to study and publish information on that in a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a first publisher and not a first corrector.