2008/4/23 Relata Refero refero.relata@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
My idea of a comprehensive review includes at least some examination of the edits of an editor prior to the implementation of a ban. Not everyone agrees. Sometimes efficient review is stifled by a low signal to noise ratio (cliched as that phrase has become these days). I think that has happened in this case, but hopefully the Committee if it chooses to accept the case can cut through the noise and make a determination.
That would be a first. More likely silence for a fortnight followed by a reminder to follow our core policies and a general amnesty.
If I were them I'd just advise them to ask people to pay a hell of a lot of attention to the pages of interest, with the finest of attention to NPOV writing whatever the participant's personal views. I really can't think of a better answer to problems like this.
And if they're such fans of Jayjg, maybe he can lead them into sensible NPOV contribution ;-)
(Jay, that's a job buzzing around and looking for you. "Your mission, should you fail to evade it ...")
- d.