Jonathan Walther wrote:
I think we could do with a good definition of what "neutral" means. If it means not supporting one view over the other, and giving all views equal time, that can be a can of worms. If neutral means "not making moral judgements about things", thats something I think we can all agree on as being neutral.
The can has long since been opened, and the definition is posted and begging to be read, at:
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_point_of_view
I would have thought you would have had the good sense to know this and to have read it a few times before boldly engaging in this debate as you have. Before you go on more about this can of worms, I'd encourage you to read it, as well as the copious discussion of it linked at the bottom of the page.
Larry