On 3/1/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
It looks like some kind of semantic game. Capable of being attributed? It suggests that we don't need to make an attribution, only assert that it is possible. Actually attributed statements (or attributions) are then verifiable.
This has been current practice for a long time. Anyone claiming (as Jimbo periodically does) that every statement actually has to be directly or indirectly referenced is not being realistic.
Steve