When a quacking duck flys into view, one knows.
Fred
From: "KNOTT, T" TKNOTT@qcl.org.uk Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:12:57 -0000 To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: [WikiEN-l] Warning shot - will it work ?
How will we know when a limited edit user has gone anon ? Even if we suspect that IP such and such is user so and so we couldn't prove it was them. IPs identify the machine not the user.
Theresa
-----Original Message----- From: Magnus Manske [mailto:magnus.manske@web.de] Sent: 21 January 2004 13:50 To: English Wikipedia Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] MNH, again
I just had this idea (not necessarily related to MNH): As a "warning shot" from one of out countless committees, a "problematic" user could be limited to a fixed number of edits per day.
That way, he can
- either waste these edits on stuff that gets reverted anyway,
- or use them more wisely,
- or leave if he doesn't think he can limit himself to "decent" edits
As example, I'd say 10 edits per day, for one week. Just to have some figures.
Circumventing these measures by creating an alternate user name or going
anon will result in immediate banning.
Magnus (who thinks a little discipline won't harm the project;-)
Fred Bauder wrote:
The members of the mediation and arbitration committees need to get on
the
stick. You can keep the pressure on...
Fred
From: "KNOTT, T" TKNOTT@qcl.org.uk Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 09:49:50 -0000 To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] MNH, again
What do we need to do to get the arbitration process sorted out
quickly?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l